Comments on: Objection to not performing the Hajj http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/08/08/objection-to-not-performing-the-hajj/ Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:07:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Abdul Momin http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/08/08/objection-to-not-performing-the-hajj/#comment-92 Abdul Momin Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:33:22 +0000 http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=23#comment-92 Sorry to be a bit off topic. But this talk reported in Badr on August 8, 1907 is nearly 6 years after the publication of Aik Ghalti Ka Azala and the supposed claim of prophethood by HMGA in that tract. Why on earth were the opponent Ulama objecting to HMGA about not performing Hajj? Surely if he was a claimant to prophethood they would never have allowed him to set foot in Mecca, much less ask him why he was not performing Hajj. There would have been no doubts in their mind whether HMGA was a Muslim or not. Since being given non-Muslim status, does anyone object to Ahmadis not performing Hajj? The purpose of my comment is not to taunt anyone, but for all those who claim that HMGA changed or enhanced his status from a non-prophet to that of a prophet in Aik Ghalti Ka Azala, this should be serious food for thought. Sorry to be a bit off topic. But this talk reported in Badr on August 8, 1907 is nearly 6 years after the publication of Aik Ghalti Ka Azala and the supposed claim of prophethood by HMGA in that tract. Why on earth were the opponent Ulama objecting to HMGA about not performing Hajj? Surely if he was a claimant to prophethood they would never have allowed him to set foot in Mecca, much less ask him why he was not performing Hajj. There would have been no doubts in their mind whether HMGA was a Muslim or not. Since being given non-Muslim status, does anyone object to Ahmadis not performing Hajj?

The purpose of my comment is not to taunt anyone, but for all those who claim that HMGA changed or enhanced his status from a non-prophet to that of a prophet in Aik Ghalti Ka Azala, this should be serious food for thought.

]]>