<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hazrat Mirza sahib as Imam and Mujaddid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/10/06/hazrat-mirza-sahib-as-imam-and-mujaddid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/10/06/hazrat-mirza-sahib-as-imam-and-mujaddid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abdul Momin</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/10/06/hazrat-mirza-sahib-as-imam-and-mujaddid/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul Momin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/10/06/hazrat-mirza-sahib-as-imam-and-mujaddid/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>I think if we study the circumstantial evidence after the publication of Aik Ghalti Ka Izala (1901) all roads point to the fact that HMGA never claimed a change in status, and any claim to the contrary is a later fabrication after his death by vested interests. It is really a revision of Ahmadiyya history. 

Since the split of 1914, the most contentious issue between the two Ahmadi jamaats is the status of HMGA (whether prophet or wali). If this issue has dogged the two jamaats for nearly a century, is it not reasonable to expect that if HMGA had announced a change in his status from non-prophet to prophet, at least some of his followers would have quit his jamaat, just like the members of the future Lahori jamaat disassociated themselves from the Qadiani section in 1914 when they could not reconcile their beliefs with those of the new Khalifa? 

Food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if we study the circumstantial evidence after the publication of Aik Ghalti Ka Izala (1901) all roads point to the fact that HMGA never claimed a change in status, and any claim to the contrary is a later fabrication after his death by vested interests. It is really a revision of Ahmadiyya history. </p>
<p>Since the split of 1914, the most contentious issue between the two Ahmadi jamaats is the status of HMGA (whether prophet or wali). If this issue has dogged the two jamaats for nearly a century, is it not reasonable to expect that if HMGA had announced a change in his status from non-prophet to prophet, at least some of his followers would have quit his jamaat, just like the members of the future Lahori jamaat disassociated themselves from the Qadiani section in 1914 when they could not reconcile their beliefs with those of the new Khalifa? </p>
<p>Food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
