<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad accepted as Mujaddid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zahid Aziz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahid Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>What the writer of the article means by mujaddid is clear from his following words (already quoted above):

"The opponents say: if Mirza sahib had not made this claim to being Messiah and Mahdi, the Muslims would generally have accepted him as the mujaddid of the time, but these claims have prevented us from accepting him as mujaddid."

The claim of "mujaddid" mentioned here is obviously what he had claimed to be before claiming to be Promised Messiah. That was the position of "mujaddid" in which the general Muslims were willing to accept him.

The entire article can be read at the link given above, and shows that by mujaddid the author means the claim advanced by Hazrat Mirza sahib at the start of the 14th century in 1883 (which no one considers as that of prophethood).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the writer of the article means by mujaddid is clear from his following words (already quoted above):</p>
<p>&#8220;The opponents say: if Mirza sahib had not made this claim to being Messiah and Mahdi, the Muslims would generally have accepted him as the mujaddid of the time, but these claims have prevented us from accepting him as mujaddid.&#8221;</p>
<p>The claim of &#8220;mujaddid&#8221; mentioned here is obviously what he had claimed to be before claiming to be Promised Messiah. That was the position of &#8220;mujaddid&#8221; in which the general Muslims were willing to accept him.</p>
<p>The entire article can be read at the link given above, and shows that by mujaddid the author means the claim advanced by Hazrat Mirza sahib at the start of the 14th century in 1883 (which no one considers as that of prophethood).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tahir Ijaz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahir Ijaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>Mujaddid and Nabi are not mutually exclusive terms. The Promised Messiah himself called Holy Prophet Mujaddid-i-Azam in "Lecture Sialkot"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mujaddid and Nabi are not mutually exclusive terms. The Promised Messiah himself called Holy Prophet Mujaddid-i-Azam in &#8220;Lecture Sialkot&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul Momin</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul Momin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2007/12/06/hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-accepted-as-mujaddid/#comment-944</guid>
		<description>A wonderful article and very informative about the true status of HMGA during his lifetime. It never occurred to his followers (while he was alive) that he was anything else but a Saint. Praise be to Allah Almighty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful article and very informative about the true status of HMGA during his lifetime. It never occurred to his followers (while he was alive) that he was anything else but a Saint. Praise be to Allah Almighty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
