<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some conclusions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2008/05/07/90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2008/05/07/90/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zahid Aziz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2008/05/07/90/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahid Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=90#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That article in the Urdu &lt;em&gt;Review of Religions,&lt;/em&gt; 1904, is in fact part of a serialisation of the Promised Messiah's book &lt;em&gt;Ainah Kamalat-i Islam,&lt;/em&gt; published 1893.

I would say that M. Ali appealed to logic and reason while Mirza Mahmud Ahmad appealed to emotion.

"Winning people's hearts" is perhaps not the right way to describe exploiting people's emotions and making them live in the realm of fantasy land where they think they have triumphed over the whole world.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That article in the Urdu <em>Review of Religions,</em> 1904, is in fact part of a serialisation of the Promised Messiah&#8217;s book <em>Ainah Kamalat-i Islam,</em> published 1893.</p>
<p>I would say that M. Ali appealed to logic and reason while Mirza Mahmud Ahmad appealed to emotion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Winning people&#8217;s hearts&#8221; is perhaps not the right way to describe exploiting people&#8217;s emotions and making them live in the realm of fantasy land where they think they have triumphed over the whole world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
