Life for these people is so much easier when they take the Qadiani jamaat’s members’ beliefs concerning HMGA at their face value. This way they don’t have to prove anything. All they have to do is to sling mud - the easiest job in the world. Like in most other matters, they are too lazy to try to understand anything which involves attaining knowledge. Their expertise lies only in mischief - which has become second nature to them.

But at least this gives us first-hand knowledge of what it must have been like in HMGA’s time.

These people really give the anti-Ahmadiyya lobby a bad name.

I have published your last comment above, even though you are impugning the integrity of our respected contributors. They don’t hide behind false names and false affiliations. No further post by you will be published here.

“Now after I got answering from you, I believe that he is one the messenger of Allah.”

But after further consideration, I realized that we are dealing with a deeply troubled person. Whatever psychological problems he may have, it is fairly obvious that his mental space has become one dimensional. Something in life has made him go over the edge. So whatever he does or says appear to him as right, and he cannot see the contradictions within his own self. What troubles me the most, however, is that like a serial killer, he actually wanted to be found out who he was and what he was. This can only be the thinking of a mentally deranged person.

As he is a fellow human being, we can only pray to the Almighty to remove his troubles and enable him to see and think clearly. Ameen.

I do not see any further point in having “discussions” with a Crank.

It is not strange for me if you also did not understand what MGA said in his book.

Read what skunk posted:

“I really thought that you will be at least worth having a debate, but after reading your responses to Hassan’s posts, it is quite evident to me, you are no different from any other Quadiani. You have absolutely no valid arguments to support your claims or support the writings of Mirza, except conjecture. Same old word game, Mirza played all his life, I am, I am not.”

I am still searching for a Quadiani who is remotely truthful. But I think my search will be in vain. I was amongst those Muslims who knew absolutely nothing about your cult. And I mean both your Anjuman and Jamat, I consider both of you the same except that your anjuman to be hypocrite of highest degree. When I started to read your Mirza’s literature I was open minded. I started to research after coming across some one in my life albeit by chance whose wife belongs to this cult.

I think you guys are halfway house. You deliberately and knowingly hide the truth that Mirza didn’t declare himself as Prophet. Anyhow, nothing Mirza wrote could be justified. I have started to write articles recently on my blog after debating on some Quadiani Forums. …..

To the blog Administrator:
Isn’t it remarkable that the first comment from the ’skunk was:

“I really thought that you will be at least worth having a debate, but after reading your responses to Hassan’s posts, it is quite evident to me, you are no different from any other Quadiani………”

A self-proclaimed anti-Qadiani finds no rationality in a Qadiani’s views when he debates with them, but seems to have such a soft corner for him here that before debating anything with the AAIIL, he condemns them before discussing anything with them!

How touching!

Why don’t you answer whether you are from Indonesia? I have asked you this three times before.

We don’t even know whether you are actually a member of the Qadiani Jamaat. It is quite possible that you are an opponent of the Ahmadiyya Movement pretending to be a Qadiani. It is an anti-Ahmadiyya ploy and tactic to try to prove that the Qadiani beliefs about Hazrat Mirza sahib’s claim are correct and ours are wrong, because it strengthens your case for denouncing the Promised Messiah. How will you prove to us that you are really a member of the Qadiani Jamaat? Perhaps with a photograph in the company of the khalifa.

Mr. Abdul Momin,
What book did you read Mr. Abdul Momin?
I am talking about book the ark noah in aaiil website which clearly mentioned that the Khatam-Ul-Khulafa means the most perfect among the successors of the Holy Prophet
Please read in the bracket on page 8
Overall, your explanation shows that you did not understand the concept well.
In this book MGA only says that Allah has conveyed to him that the Muhammadi Messiah
stands higher in RANK than the Mosaic Messiah.
he did not say anything about the Last successor

Mr. Abdul Momin said: “However, while there can be no more prophets after the last of the prophets (Holy Prophet) because the perfection of scriptures prevents the appearance of a new prophet, a new Muslim saint in the future who does not resemble an Isreali prophet is not forbidden to the world because no saint ever brings or adds anything to the exisiting scriptures. ”

If MGA claims that he was the Last saints, how could a new Muslim saint in the future still can appear into the world?