What this Mueen Khan has written is absolutely absurd. It means if anyone wants to go to heaven as a true Muslim he should not write anything against Dr ZN! To criticise ZN is like attacking the Holy Prophet Muhammad!

Another person wrote to me:

“If Dr. Zakir reveales the The Same Truth as Maulana Vidyarthy did many years before, he has not committed any crime against morality and ethics.”

So if someone, in some remote part of the world, publishes the teachings of the religion of Islam as if they were his own, he is revealing “the same truth” as the Holy Prophet Muhammad and has not committed any crime against morality!

There seems to be a whole industry of blind admirers of Dr ZN. There is even a website called “I love Zakir Naik”: http://www.ilovezakirnaik.com. Is this a personality cult?

If you are true follower of Islam and know the knowledge of Islam,then you should not write anything against Dr Zakir Naik.

Dr Zakir naik is truely genuess.

At this link you can access the first English edition of Muhammad in World Scriptures by Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi published in 1940, almost 70 years ago. Just look at the Hindu and Zoroastrian sections of the book and compare with Zakir Naik’s lectures. If he is that honest, he should at least acknowledge this. Perhaps his supporters could ask him this question at a lecture.

Then in my comment above, I gave links to interviews with Zakir Naik on a Pakistani TV channel where he stated that Islam prohibits non-Muslims from propagating their religions or building places of worship in a Muslim country. But he himself is living in a non-Muslim country preaching Islam to its non-Muslim majority!

His argument is laughable, that it is like appointing a teacher to teach children mathematics who himself doesn’t know 2+2 correctly. This means he thinks that Muslim adults in a Muslim country are like little children who will accept whatever they are told by some non-Muslim preacher! Children in a school have to have a teacher who must teach correct facts because they believe whatever the teacher says. Adults listening to a preacher can make up their own minds.

I was so impressed….

As i remember, it was the area around Makka (i guess Hijaz) where non muslims are prohibited to propagate their religion on build their places of worship. It was for reason that they were creating disturbance in society.  Later on Muslims and now current rulers of Saudi Arabia has included whole of SA in the sacred precincts. This is the reasons when US military was stationed in SA, they were not allowed to buid their church and they worshiped in their homes etc.

Prohibiting people of other religion from building their places of worship in sacred precincts is acceptable rule in world. In Vatican City, a mosque can not be built. Neither christian denominations other than Catholics are allowed to build their churches. Please correct me if i am wrong. Thanks.

http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/drlaura.htm