<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ibn Al-Haytham: &#8220;The first true scientist&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2012/11/02/ibn-al-haytham-the-first-true-scientist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2012/11/02/ibn-al-haytham-the-first-true-scientist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Steffens</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2012/11/02/ibn-al-haytham-the-first-true-scientist/#comment-8063</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Steffens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=2232#comment-8063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great link. I have to admit that I take some personal satisfaction at the inclusion of Ibn al-Haytham, the subject of my 2007 biography &lt;a title=&quot;Ibn al Haytham First Scientist&quot; href=&quot;http://www.firstscientist.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ibn al-Haytham&lt;/a&gt;: First Scientist, in this list. When my book was on press, I saw a Science Channel promo in which Stephen Hawking--the smartest guy in the world, right?--was saying that Galileo was the first true scientist because he was the first person to conduct experiments to test hypotheses. Long before Jim al-Khalili&#039;s article, my book laid out the case for Ibn al-Haytham as the first true scientist. Did my little book change the way historians have begun to portray the Muslim contribution the scientific method and the Renaissance? When I wrote my book, no one in the West or in translation was calling Ibn al-Haytham the first modern scientist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great link. I have to admit that I take some personal satisfaction at the inclusion of Ibn al-Haytham, the subject of my 2007 biography <a title="Ibn al Haytham First Scientist" href="http://www.firstscientist.net/" rel="nofollow">Ibn al-Haytham</a>: First Scientist, in this list. When my book was on press, I saw a Science Channel promo in which Stephen Hawking&#8211;the smartest guy in the world, right?&#8211;was saying that Galileo was the first true scientist because he was the first person to conduct experiments to test hypotheses. Long before Jim al-Khalili&#8217;s article, my book laid out the case for Ibn al-Haytham as the first true scientist. Did my little book change the way historians have begun to portray the Muslim contribution the scientific method and the Renaissance? When I wrote my book, no one in the West or in translation was calling Ibn al-Haytham the first modern scientist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
