<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by Zahid Aziz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3750</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahid Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Usman:&lt;/em&gt; One of Shahin&#039;s startling claims is this:

&quot;and what about the Punjab holacoust that took place during Mirzas time did Mirza ever mention any of this in his 80+ books he wrote ? an estimate of about 10 million people died as a result&quot;.

When did this happen!

&lt;em&gt;Ikram: &lt;/em&gt;Regarding the Holy Prophet&#039;s wife Safiyya, I included the following in my book &lt;em&gt;Islam, Peace and Tolerance&lt;/em&gt;:

Once Hazrat Hafsah derogatorily called her “daughter of a Jew”. When the Prophet heard of this, he said to Safiyya that she should have replied by saying:

“How can you be better than me when my husband is Muhammad, my father is Aaron, and my uncle is Moses.” (Tirmidhi)

The Holy Prophet then reprimanded Hafsa by telling her: “Fear God”. Hafsa was daughter of the highly-distinguished Umar, the second senior-most follower of the Prophet, and she belonged to the same tribe as the Holy Prophet. But the Prophet here indicates that while Hafsa was related to one prophet, Safiyya was not only his wife but had, in addition, the prophet Aaron as a father and the prophet Moses as a paternal uncle due to her Jewish descent. In Muslim belief she was connected to at least three prophets. This is the retort she should have given, the Holy Prophet advised her, to those proud Arabs who styled her as daughter of a Jew and boasted about themselves being from among the relatives of the Prophet himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Usman:</em> One of Shahin&#8217;s startling claims is this:</p>
<p>&#8220;and what about the Punjab holacoust that took place during Mirzas time did Mirza ever mention any of this in his 80+ books he wrote ? an estimate of about 10 million people died as a result&#8221;.</p>
<p>When did this happen!</p>
<p><em>Ikram: </em>Regarding the Holy Prophet&#8217;s wife Safiyya, I included the following in my book <em>Islam, Peace and Tolerance</em>:</p>
<p>Once Hazrat Hafsah derogatorily called her “daughter of a Jew”. When the Prophet heard of this, he said to Safiyya that she should have replied by saying:</p>
<p>“How can you be better than me when my husband is Muhammad, my father is Aaron, and my uncle is Moses.” (Tirmidhi)</p>
<p>The Holy Prophet then reprimanded Hafsa by telling her: “Fear God”. Hafsa was daughter of the highly-distinguished Umar, the second senior-most follower of the Prophet, and she belonged to the same tribe as the Holy Prophet. But the Prophet here indicates that while Hafsa was related to one prophet, Safiyya was not only his wife but had, in addition, the prophet Aaron as a father and the prophet Moses as a paternal uncle due to her Jewish descent. In Muslim belief she was connected to at least three prophets. This is the retort she should have given, the Holy Prophet advised her, to those proud Arabs who styled her as daughter of a Jew and boasted about themselves being from among the relatives of the Prophet himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by Usman</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3749</link>
		<dc:creator>Usman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3749</guid>
		<description>Dr. ZA makes a very valid point here.  Similarly an individual hiding behind the id of &quot;cranktahtskunk&quot; makes some startling claims about the Quran&#039;s position on certain matters on his blog.  Following his debate with OMLK, one sees that he is  taking clear positions against the Quranic teachings (even the interpretations of non-Ahmadi scholars like Maudoodi).  It is quite pathetic that these people have no shame in twisting the meaning of the Quran just to malign HMGA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. ZA makes a very valid point here.  Similarly an individual hiding behind the id of &#8220;cranktahtskunk&#8221; makes some startling claims about the Quran&#8217;s position on certain matters on his blog.  Following his debate with OMLK, one sees that he is  taking clear positions against the Quranic teachings (even the interpretations of non-Ahmadi scholars like Maudoodi).  It is quite pathetic that these people have no shame in twisting the meaning of the Quran just to malign HMGA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by ikram</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>ikram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3748</guid>
		<description>A little off but relevant anecdote of how Islam gives freedom to relations and their religion:
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safiyya_bint_Huyayy#Legacy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Safiyya &lt;/a&gt;[wife of Muhammad PBUH] died in 670 or 672, during the reign of Muawiyah, and was buried in the Jannat al-Baqi graveyard.  She left an estate of 100,000 dirhams in land and goods, one-third of which she bequeathed to her sister&#039;s son, who followed Judaism. Her dwelling in Medina was bought by Muawiyya for 180,000 dirhams.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little off but relevant anecdote of how Islam gives freedom to relations and their religion:<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safiyya_bint_Huyayy#Legacy" rel="nofollow">Safiyya </a>[wife of Muhammad PBUH] died in 670 or 672, during the reign of Muawiyah, and was buried in the Jannat al-Baqi graveyard.  She left an estate of 100,000 dirhams in land and goods, one-third of which she bequeathed to her sister&#8217;s son, who followed Judaism. Her dwelling in Medina was bought by Muawiyya for 180,000 dirhams.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by Zahid Aziz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3747</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahid Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3747</guid>
		<description>People like Shahin must think that we are extremely naive and will not be able to discover what their game is. He has submitted comments containing plain falsehood. He alleges that we (yes, we, the Lahore Ahmadis) are trying to hide that Mirza Mahmud Ahmad called other Muslims as kafir! This statement, and some of his other statements, are so bizarre and absurd that it is clear what he is trying to do is just to have his allegations published by us.

These people believe that if you publish dirt, it will stick, no matter how false the allegations and how strongly they are disproved. When one reads the blatant falsehood these people knowingly write, one realises that the words used by Hazrat Mirza sahib against such vile opponents are perfectly applicable.

An example of Shahin&#039;s falsehood is that he has submitted a reply to Rashid&#039;s point, as to why Muslims are allowed to marry Jewish and Christian women, saying: &quot;if study carefully the islamic history then u will see that even the Sahabas who married woman of the Ahle Kitab later they had to divorce these woman, why ?&quot;

This is absolutely false.

He also says: &quot;u are suppose to teach them to learn about islam then they would accept islam in the end&quot;.

Again, it is absolutely false to say that their Muslims husbands are required to convert them to Islam. In fact, the husbands are required to give them freedom to practise their religion. That they may accept Islam is a different matter.

These people can only get away with such total lies because they are anonymous. A known, identifiable anti-Ahmadiyya zealot would never dare say this because he would be rightly accused of &lt;strong&gt;perverting &lt;/strong&gt;the teachings of Islam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like Shahin must think that we are extremely naive and will not be able to discover what their game is. He has submitted comments containing plain falsehood. He alleges that we (yes, we, the Lahore Ahmadis) are trying to hide that Mirza Mahmud Ahmad called other Muslims as kafir! This statement, and some of his other statements, are so bizarre and absurd that it is clear what he is trying to do is just to have his allegations published by us.</p>
<p>These people believe that if you publish dirt, it will stick, no matter how false the allegations and how strongly they are disproved. When one reads the blatant falsehood these people knowingly write, one realises that the words used by Hazrat Mirza sahib against such vile opponents are perfectly applicable.</p>
<p>An example of Shahin&#8217;s falsehood is that he has submitted a reply to Rashid&#8217;s point, as to why Muslims are allowed to marry Jewish and Christian women, saying: &#8220;if study carefully the islamic history then u will see that even the Sahabas who married woman of the Ahle Kitab later they had to divorce these woman, why ?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is absolutely false.</p>
<p>He also says: &#8220;u are suppose to teach them to learn about islam then they would accept islam in the end&#8221;.</p>
<p>Again, it is absolutely false to say that their Muslims husbands are required to convert them to Islam. In fact, the husbands are required to give them freedom to practise their religion. That they may accept Islam is a different matter.</p>
<p>These people can only get away with such total lies because they are anonymous. A known, identifiable anti-Ahmadiyya zealot would never dare say this because he would be rightly accused of <strong>perverting </strong>the teachings of Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by Rashid</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>Understanding Islamic Revival In Its Proper Context
By Yasser Latif Hamdani
 Pak Tea House blog has interesting write-up. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://pakteahouse.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/understanding-islamic-revival-in-its-proper-context/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pakteahouse.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/understanding-islamic-revival-in-its-proper-context/#comments&lt;/a&gt;
 
Ikram’s comment:
@YLH
 
My 2 cents:
 
1) “So for example, the Western civilization- as we know it today- has for evolved out of a Judaeo-Christian cultural norms and as it is secularized, it is enriched by other cultural strains but it remains manifestly a product of Judaeo-Christian evolution.”
 
I would say the Western civilization-as we know it today- has evolved out of Judaeo-Christian-Islamic cultural norms. My reason:
 
First state in USA to allow women to own property, conduct business and be financially independent is California. California law has its roots in Spanish Law. And Spain is first country to grant these rights to women in Europe. Spanish law has its roots in Islamic law brought by Moors. 
 
2) In last paragraph you wrote:
“Islam’s on-going Lutheran Movement has not emerged from within the confines of Darul Ulooms and Jamias. This movement has come from the middle class – and for a time it will remain confused and shall be violent for a while as it is now- but ultimately it will reform the Muslim World and usher upon it an age of reason, enlightenment and I daresay modern secularism.”
 
Since in your write-up you mentioned Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian “…Mirza Ghulam Ahmed of Qadian presented themselves as Mujadads and reformers…” I will quote him, according to him; it was his Ilham (revelation). Copied from Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement blog:
 
‘Dunya mein aik nazier aaya, per dunya nay oos ko kabool na kia. Laikan Khuda issay kabool karay gha, aur baray zoorawar humloon say oos ki sachai zahir karay gha’
 
(A Warner came to the world, but world did not accept him. But Allah will accept him, and with very powerful attacks will manifest his truthfulness).
 
So when I see that when even people like “Shaikh-ul-Islam” Dr. Muhammad Tahir ul-Qadri issuing 600-page fatwa against violence and terrorism in name of Islam, it convinces me that may be this logical change is consequence of “Powerful Attacks” on Islam from within its own ranks. Ironically, it was the same rejection of armed Jihad for which Mirza was smeared by the general opinion.
 
Ordinarily, the audience of Ghamdi seem to be moved by his plain logic and rationality, but to someone who has read Mirza Ghulam Ahmed and his lieutenants namely, Muhammad Ali and Khawaja Kamaluddin, Ghamdi clearly sounds the same except that he does not acknowledge these men by their name. But that is okay. Value of mail is in the letter, not the envelope.
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understanding Islamic Revival In Its Proper Context<br />
By Yasser Latif Hamdani<br />
 Pak Tea House blog has interesting write-up.<br />
<a href="http://pakteahouse.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/understanding-islamic-revival-in-its-proper-context/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://pakteahouse.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/understanding-islamic-revival-in-its-proper-context/#comments</a><br />
 <br />
Ikram’s comment:<br />
@YLH<br />
 <br />
My 2 cents:<br />
 <br />
1) “So for example, the Western civilization- as we know it today- has for evolved out of a Judaeo-Christian cultural norms and as it is secularized, it is enriched by other cultural strains but it remains manifestly a product of Judaeo-Christian evolution.”<br />
 <br />
I would say the Western civilization-as we know it today- has evolved out of Judaeo-Christian-Islamic cultural norms. My reason:<br />
 <br />
First state in USA to allow women to own property, conduct business and be financially independent is California. California law has its roots in Spanish Law. And Spain is first country to grant these rights to women in Europe. Spanish law has its roots in Islamic law brought by Moors.<br />
 <br />
2) In last paragraph you wrote:<br />
“Islam’s on-going Lutheran Movement has not emerged from within the confines of Darul Ulooms and Jamias. This movement has come from the middle class – and for a time it will remain confused and shall be violent for a while as it is now- but ultimately it will reform the Muslim World and usher upon it an age of reason, enlightenment and I daresay modern secularism.”<br />
 <br />
Since in your write-up you mentioned Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian “…Mirza Ghulam Ahmed of Qadian presented themselves as Mujadads and reformers…” I will quote him, according to him; it was his Ilham (revelation). Copied from Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement blog:<br />
 <br />
‘Dunya mein aik nazier aaya, per dunya nay oos ko kabool na kia. Laikan Khuda issay kabool karay gha, aur baray zoorawar humloon say oos ki sachai zahir karay gha’<br />
 <br />
(A Warner came to the world, but world did not accept him. But Allah will accept him, and with very powerful attacks will manifest his truthfulness).<br />
 <br />
So when I see that when even people like “Shaikh-ul-Islam” Dr. Muhammad Tahir ul-Qadri issuing 600-page fatwa against violence and terrorism in name of Islam, it convinces me that may be this logical change is consequence of “Powerful Attacks” on Islam from within its own ranks. Ironically, it was the same rejection of armed Jihad for which Mirza was smeared by the general opinion.<br />
 <br />
Ordinarily, the audience of Ghamdi seem to be moved by his plain logic and rationality, but to someone who has read Mirza Ghulam Ahmed and his lieutenants namely, Muhammad Ali and Khawaja Kamaluddin, Ghamdi clearly sounds the same except that he does not acknowledge these men by their name. But that is okay. Value of mail is in the letter, not the envelope.<br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Significance of the &#8216;Kalima&#8217; by Rashid</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/03/13/significance-of-the-kalima/#comment-3735</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=679#comment-3735</guid>
		<description>Honesty is a human virtue. Verses of Holy Quran posted by Ikram highlight the underlying theme of dishonesty in people referenced in them. Dishonesty has different forms such as dishonesty in thoughts, religious decrees, judgments, financial dealings, and social dealings etc. In my opinion it is impossible to implement spirit of Kalima-Shahada in one&#039;s life if that person lacks the fundamental human virtue i.e. honesty.

A person needs to be a decent human before s/he can attain a status of a Muslim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honesty is a human virtue. Verses of Holy Quran posted by Ikram highlight the underlying theme of dishonesty in people referenced in them. Dishonesty has different forms such as dishonesty in thoughts, religious decrees, judgments, financial dealings, and social dealings etc. In my opinion it is impossible to implement spirit of Kalima-Shahada in one&#8217;s life if that person lacks the fundamental human virtue i.e. honesty.</p>
<p>A person needs to be a decent human before s/he can attain a status of a Muslim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Significance of the &#8216;Kalima&#8217; by Zahid Aziz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/03/13/significance-of-the-kalima/#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahid Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=679#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hazrat Maulana Nur-ud-Din once told someone that if he wished to live a happy life he should neither try to be God nor the messenger of God.

The man was puzzled and asked, How could I ever try to be God? Hazrat Maulana replied: When something happens against your will and you are displeased by it, you are trying to be God because He is the only one against Whose will nothing can happen.

The man asked: And how could I ever try to the messenger of God? Hazrat Maulana replied: When someone opposes you, and you feel frustrated that God does not destroy him for opposing you, then you are trying to be a man sent by God because it is only in their case that all their opponents are destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazrat Maulana Nur-ud-Din once told someone that if he wished to live a happy life he should neither try to be God nor the messenger of God.</p>
<p>The man was puzzled and asked, How could I ever try to be God? Hazrat Maulana replied: When something happens against your will and you are displeased by it, you are trying to be God because He is the only one against Whose will nothing can happen.</p>
<p>The man asked: And how could I ever try to the messenger of God? Hazrat Maulana replied: When someone opposes you, and you feel frustrated that God does not destroy him for opposing you, then you are trying to be a man sent by God because it is only in their case that all their opponents are destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A leading voice in moderate Islam passes away by Rashid</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/03/11/a-leading-voice-in-moderate-islam-passes-away/#comment-3724</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=665#comment-3724</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Inna LiL&#039;Lahay Wa Inna ELay Hay Rajay&#039;oon&lt;/em&gt;

It is very sad to hear news of passing away of Sheikh Muhammad Syed Tantawi.
More than before moderate, rational and peaceful scholars of Islam, like him, are desperately needed to guide millions of today’s misguided Muslims. May Allah grant him reward for taking stand against all opposition of Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement. May Allah grant him final abode in paradise and patience to his survivors. &lt;em&gt;Ameen.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Inna LiL&#8217;Lahay Wa Inna ELay Hay Rajay&#8217;oon</em></p>
<p>It is very sad to hear news of passing away of Sheikh Muhammad Syed Tantawi.<br />
More than before moderate, rational and peaceful scholars of Islam, like him, are desperately needed to guide millions of today’s misguided Muslims. May Allah grant him reward for taking stand against all opposition of Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement. May Allah grant him final abode in paradise and patience to his survivors. <em>Ameen.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by Zahid Aziz</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3711</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahid Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3711</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thank Shahin for resolving another issue by his comment: &quot;brother please dont confuse muslim rulers with islam yes they may have islamic names ... they are even worst than the non muslims. &quot;

So, according to Shahin and his anti-Ahmadiyya supporters, these rulers are not &quot;real&quot; (&lt;em&gt;haqiqi&lt;/em&gt;) Muslims. The issue it resolves is this. When we, the Lahore Ahmadis, say that we regard other Muslims as Muslims, they retort against us: &quot;But you don&#039;t regard us as real Muslims&quot;. This was also, I believe, raised against us in the 1974 Pakistan National Assembly hearings.

Now we learn from Shahin that Muslim rulers of the above character (e.g. Z.A. Bhutto) are not real Muslims! So instead of accusing and trying to trap Lahore Ahmadis by asking about &quot;real&quot; Muslims, our accusers should obtain a fatwa from Shahin and co. about whether they are real Muslims.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thank Shahin for resolving another issue by his comment: &#8220;brother please dont confuse muslim rulers with islam yes they may have islamic names &#8230; they are even worst than the non muslims. &#8221;</p>
<p>So, according to Shahin and his anti-Ahmadiyya supporters, these rulers are not &#8220;real&#8221; (<em>haqiqi</em>) Muslims. The issue it resolves is this. When we, the Lahore Ahmadis, say that we regard other Muslims as Muslims, they retort against us: &#8220;But you don&#8217;t regard us as real Muslims&#8221;. This was also, I believe, raised against us in the 1974 Pakistan National Assembly hearings.</p>
<p>Now we learn from Shahin that Muslim rulers of the above character (e.g. Z.A. Bhutto) are not real Muslims! So instead of accusing and trying to trap Lahore Ahmadis by asking about &#8220;real&#8221; Muslims, our accusers should obtain a fatwa from Shahin and co. about whether they are real Muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harbingers of winds of change… by Rashid</title>
		<link>http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/2010/02/23/harbingers-of-winds-of-change%e2%80%a6/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahmadiyya.org/WordPress/?p=657#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>@Shahin:
 
Brother, Sultan is Arabic language word and Monarch is English language word. (Monarch = Sultan). 
Just because some one in authority, and has gun, calls his law a Shariah, does NOT mean it is Shariah. Remember, Sufi Muhammad in Swat and Mulla Omar in Afghanistan and Pakistani  Talibans called their law as “Shariah”. But 100s of millions of Muslims do NOT accept it as “Shariah”.
 
Your: “why did Mirza support such a regime when they where commiting acts of genocide and massacares against other races let me give u a example when the Boer War broke out in 1899 Mirza openly supported the war and he even raised money and asked his followers to take part in this unholy war against the weak and the innocent why ?”
 
First of all, there was NO CNN and Aljazeera in Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s time. So, HMGA did NOT know if there was any “genocide and massacres” as you said. This could very much be propaganda. Just the way there is huge propaganda that Turkey and Turkish Muslims committed “genocide and massacres” of Armenians. 
 
Secondly, HMGA did NOT support “genocide and massacres” of anyone including Boer people. USA Muslims do NOT support “genocide and massacres” by USA (this is what enemies of USA accuse of America doing), but still they are paying taxes that are used to provide military aid to Israel, which Israel uses to kill babies, women, children in Lebanon and Palestine. USA is itself at war with Muslims. And in USA wars, there are Muslim soldiers who fight and die killing Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. I would like to see your reference where HMGA has “supported” British rulers in India in their acts of “genocide and massacres”. 
 
In your post addressed to Dr. Zahid Aziz, you wrote:
“Allah says in the Quran do not take Jews or Christians as your freinds or protecters”
 
If I accept what you are saying, then please tell me why Holy Quran allows Muslims to marry Jews and Christians? Don’t you think closest form of friendship is relation between a husband and a wife? And are husband and wife are not suppose to protect each other even if one is Jew or Christian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shahin:<br />
 <br />
Brother, Sultan is Arabic language word and Monarch is English language word. (Monarch = Sultan).<br />
Just because some one in authority, and has gun, calls his law a Shariah, does NOT mean it is Shariah. Remember, Sufi Muhammad in Swat and Mulla Omar in Afghanistan and Pakistani  Talibans called their law as “Shariah”. But 100s of millions of Muslims do NOT accept it as “Shariah”.<br />
 <br />
Your: “why did Mirza support such a regime when they where commiting acts of genocide and massacares against other races let me give u a example when the Boer War broke out in 1899 Mirza openly supported the war and he even raised money and asked his followers to take part in this unholy war against the weak and the innocent why ?”<br />
 <br />
First of all, there was NO CNN and Aljazeera in Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s time. So, HMGA did NOT know if there was any “genocide and massacres” as you said. This could very much be propaganda. Just the way there is huge propaganda that Turkey and Turkish Muslims committed “genocide and massacres” of Armenians.<br />
 <br />
Secondly, HMGA did NOT support “genocide and massacres” of anyone including Boer people. USA Muslims do NOT support “genocide and massacres” by USA (this is what enemies of USA accuse of America doing), but still they are paying taxes that are used to provide military aid to Israel, which Israel uses to kill babies, women, children in Lebanon and Palestine. USA is itself at war with Muslims. And in USA wars, there are Muslim soldiers who fight and die killing Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. I would like to see your reference where HMGA has “supported” British rulers in India in their acts of “genocide and massacres”.<br />
 <br />
In your post addressed to Dr. Zahid Aziz, you wrote:<br />
“Allah says in the Quran do not take Jews or Christians as your freinds or protecters”<br />
 <br />
If I accept what you are saying, then please tell me why Holy Quran allows Muslims to marry Jews and Christians? Don’t you think closest form of friendship is relation between a husband and a wife? And are husband and wife are not suppose to protect each other even if one is Jew or Christian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
