No Claim to Prophethood
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is accused of claiming to be a prophet,
in violation of the Islamic teaching that the Holy Prophet Muhammad
was the Last of the Prophets (Khatam-un-nabiyyin or Khatam-ul-anbiya).
This is an entirely false allegation, as we will now prove.
This discussion is divided into the following topics:
- Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
declared that the Holy Prophet Muhammad was the Last Prophet
after whom no prophet at all can possibly come. See link.
- He
repeatedly denied the charge that he was claiming to be
a prophet. See link.
- He
explained that the words prophet (nabi) and
messenger (rasul) about him are only meant
metaphorically, and not in a real sense. Word prophet
can be considered as deleted and replaced by
muhaddas. See link.
- He
rejected the belief that the Promised Messiah, according
to Hadith reports, must be a prophet. See link.
- In Islamic
tradition and practice, the words prophet (nabi)
and messenger (rasul) can be applied to non-prophets. See link.
- He
stated that those who believe in a prophet after the Holy Prophet
Muhammad are making that prophet into the Khatam-un-nabiyyin
instead of the Holy Prophet. See link.
- He
wrote in a major book one year before his death (Haqiqat-ul-Wahy)
that Holy Prophet Muhammad came at the end of all the prophets. See link.
- He
did not claim to be a prophet in Haqiqat-ul-Wahy: Response
to Qadiani Jamaat members. See link.
- In his Lecture Ludhiana, November 1905, he declared that prophethood ended with the Holy Prophet Muhammad:
- His
explanation of Quranic verse (4:69) about prophets, truthful,
faithful, righteous: four qualities bestowed upon saints
in Islam. See link.
- Hazrat
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on the views of the classical great scholars
of Islam about prophethood and revelation. See link.
- Hazrat Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad DID NOT claim prophethood in his booklet Ayk Ghalati
Ka Izala (Correction of an Error or A Misunderstanding
Removed):
|