The Lahore Ahmadiyya Islamic Movement
Showing Islam is Peaceful • Tolerant • Rational • Inspiring
www.ahmadiyya.orgA Research and Educational Website
Home
1. Islam
2. Ahmadiyya Movement

Refuting the Qadiani Beliefs

Pre-Split beliefs in Ahmadiyya Movement that no prophet can come after Prophet Muhammad


Earlier beliefs of leading figures of the Qadiani Jama‘at

Mirza Mahmud Ahmad confirms finality of prophethood in 1910
3. Publications & Resources

Contact us
Search the website

Mirza Mahmud Ahmad wrote in 1910 that Prophet Muhammad was the Last Prophet

The Khalifa of the Qadiani group, Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad (their leader from 1914 to 1965), who originated their belief that prophets can come after the Holy Prophet Muhammad, himself had earlier expressed the correct belief that no prophet can come after the Holy Prophet Muhammad because he was the Khatam-un-nabiyyin.

In 1910, two years after the death of’ Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad wrote an article entitled Najaat (Salvation) which was published in the monthly Tashhiz-ul-Azhan, the magazine which he himself owned and edited. Shown below is the front cover of that issue (April 1910, vol. v, no. 4) in which this article appeared:

Tashhiz-ul-Azhan cover page

(In the image above, we have highlighted the name of the editor, Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, and the title of the article in question.)

In this article, he explains the meaning of the Khatam-un-nabiyyin verse of the Holy Quran (33:40) as follows:

“In this verse God has said that the Holy Prophet Muhammad is the Khatam-un-nabiyyin, and none shall come after him who may be raised to the status of prophethood, and who may abrogate his teachings and establish a new law. Nay, however many saints (auliya) there are, and righteous and pious persons, they will get all that they get through service to him. Thus God has said that the Holy Prophet’s prophethood was meant not only for his times, but that in future too no prophet would come. …

Another point must be remembered here, namely, that in this verse God says: ‘God is ever Knower of all things’. This does not appear to have an obvious connection here because it was not necessary to say, regarding the things God has explained, that He is the Knower of everything. The fact is that the Holy Prophet’s being the Khatam-un-nabiyyin contains a prophecy. This is that before the Holy Prophet Muhammad there arose hundreds of prophets in the world that we know about and who had great success. In fact, there does not appear to be any century in which, at one place or another, no claimant to prophethood could be found. So Krishna, Ramachandra, Buddha, Confucius, Zoroaster, Moses and Jesus are those whose followers still exist in the world, and are forcefully doing their work, each group putting forward the claim of its truth. But thirteen hundred years have passed since the Holy Prophet’s claim, and no one who claimed prophethood has ever attained success. After all, prior to his time people used to claim prophethood, and many of them were successful, whom we believe to be true. But why has this arrangement stopped with his advent? Why is no one successful now? Obviously because of the prophecy that he is the Khatam-un-nabiyyin. Now we ask the opponents of Islam, what greater sign can there be than the fact that, after the Holy Prophet, no person who claimed prophethood was successful. It is this which is referred to in the words: ‘God is ever Knower of all things’. That is to say, We have made him Khatam-un-nabiyyin and We know that no prophet would come after him, and any liar making such a claim would be destroyed. This, therefore, is a historical prophecy which no one can possibly refute.”

(Pages 151–152; underlining above is ours)

It is clearly stated in this article that:

  • “… none shall come after him [Prophet Muhammad] who may be raised to the status of prophethood”
  • Those who come after him among the Muslims are the auliya or saints.
  • “the Holy Prophet’s prophethood was meant not only for his times, but that in future too no prophet would come”
  • “…what greater sign can there be than the fact that, after the Holy Prophet, no person who claimed prophethood was successful…”
  • God says in the Quran that “We know that no prophet would come after him, and any liar making such a claim would be destroyed”.

This proves conclusively that the Qadiani belief that prophets can come after the Holy Prophet Muhammad and that Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a prophet, was a later development, much after the death of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad who died in May 1908. Therefore Hazrat Mirza could never have taught these beliefs, and indeed what he taught was exactly what Mirza Mahmud Ahmad has written in the above article.

Image of original Urdu article

Shown below are the images of the complete pages 151 and 152 from the original magazine Tashhiz-ul-Azhan, on which the above extract occurs. We have highlighted some text in yellow.

Tashhiz-ul-Azhan, p. 151
Tashhiz-ul-Azhan, p. 152

Top